출처: Block Media
Ripple and BlackRock Collaboration Rumors Resurface in U.S. Crypto Community
Buzz around a possible collaboration between Ripple (XRP) and BlackRock to tokenize the global financial system has reignited in the U.S. cryptocurrency sphere. Speculation suggests that Ripple’s ongoing legal battle with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) could be a “political smokescreen” in a pre-coordinated strategy. However, a former SEC attorney has outright dismissed these theories, stating, “The XRP lawsuit has no connection to BlackRock.”
Ripple and BlackRock: Exploring Tokenization and Digital Identity
Recent reports from CoinGape (October 23) reveal how the “Ripple-BlackRock conspiracy theory” has started to trend on X (formerly Twitter), with hashtags sparking discussions within the community. Advocates of this theory argue that BlackRock’s increasing emphasis on tokenization across the financial sector aligns closely with Ripple’s blockchain infrastructure, particularly the XRP Ledger (XRPL). Comparisons have emerged between BlackRock’s risk management platform, Aladdin, tokenized bonds, and digital identity systems. Such parallels have led to claims of potential strategic synergy between Ripple and BlackRock.
Proponents of XRP highlight Ripple’s partnership with Ondo Finance to tokenize U.S. Treasury securities on XRPL as further evidence of alignment. They also draw attention to the background of Nathan Allman, Ondo Finance’s co-founder, who previously held roles at BlackRock and Goldman Sachs—paralleling the career history of former SEC Chair Gary Gensler. Some theories go even further, suggesting that Gensler’s handling of Ripple’s legal case could ultimately serve to legitimize XRP and lay the groundwork for collaboration with BlackRock. This notion fuels the belief that the SEC lawsuit may have been a calculated step in positioning Ripple strategically.
SEC Attorney Refutes Conspiracy Claims
Legal experts, however, have dismissed such theories outright. Marc Fagel, former SEC San Francisco Regional Office Director, rebuked the speculation, stating on X, “The XRP lawsuit was initiated during Jay Clayton’s tenure in the Trump administration, well before Gary Gensler became SEC Chair.” Fagel clarified that linking Gensler and BlackRock to Ripple’s lawsuit conflicts with established timelines and historical events.
This rebuttal counters the narrative perpetuated by some XRP supporters, who allege that Gensler deliberately targeted Ripple due to ulterior motives. Analysts within the legal and financial sectors assert that, given the broader context and sequence of events, the rumored connection between Ripple, BlackRock, and the SEC lawsuit appears improbable.
Overlapping Strategies and Technologies Garner Interest
Despite widespread skepticism, some within the crypto and financial communities remain intrigued by the apparent similarities in Ripple’s and BlackRock’s strategic initiatives. Ripple’s tokenization roadmap for XRP Ledger spans multiple sectors, including real estate, government bonds, commodities, central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), and carbon credits, which aligns closely with BlackRock’s drive to digitize real assets.
Another area drawing scrutiny is XRPL’s decentralized identity solutions and sovereign data infrastructure, which some theorists believe could complement BlackRock’s data-centric asset management focus. Adding fuel to speculation, market watchers have noted an alignment between the ticker XDNA—used by BlackRock’s health and genomics ETF—and DNA Protocol ($XDNA), which is built on XRP Ledger.
Additionally, Ripple’s role in advancing ISO 20022 messaging standards—adopted by the Federal Reserve for its Fedwire real-time payment network—has been interpreted as evidence of potential system compatibility between Ripple’s XRPL and BlackRock’s broader financial mechanisms.
Rumors Lack Substantial Evidence
Despite an upswing in speculative chatter, industry experts remain firm in their assessment that the Ripple-BlackRock collaboration rumors lack any tangible evidence. While technological and strategic similarities between the two entities are undeniable, the suggestion of deliberate political manipulation around Ripple’s SEC lawsuit remains far-fetched.
As CoinGape’s analysis emphasizes, “The XRP community’s enthusiasm for such narratives should be tempered by a distinction between verifiable facts and speculative theories about corporate partnerships.” While Ripple and BlackRock share overlapping goals in tokenization and digitization, claims of an active partnership rest solely within the realm of conjecture.
Conclusion
Without credible proof, the Ripple-BlackRock collaboration theories persist largely as a mix of wishful thinking and speculative alignment. While Ripple’s role in advancing blockchain innovation and BlackRock’s efforts in financial tokenization run parallel in many respects, their connection—particularly through the lens of the SEC lawsuit—remains unsupported by concrete evidence. As these rumors continue circulating, crypto enthusiasts are advised to approach them with discernment and focus on proven developments in the evolving blockchain and asset management industries.
