Massachusetts Lawsuit Targets Prediction Market Platform Kalshi Over Alleged Unlicensed Sports Betting

Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell has taken legal action against the prediction market platform Kalshi, alleging the company is engaged in illegal sports betting activities without the necessary state license. On October 13, Campbell officially announced the lawsuit, arguing that Kalshi must adhere to state gambling laws and obtain proper licensing before facilitating any sports betting transactions. As part of the legal proceedings, the state has requested a court injunction to prevent Kalshi from offering contracts on sports events until the matter is resolved.

Kalshi’s Defense: Federal Oversight vs. State Laws

Kalshi maintains that its operations fall under the jurisdiction of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) as a federally regulated "prediction market," asserting that adherence to federal regulations exempts it from state-specific gambling laws. The platform argues that federal oversight through the CFTC supersedes Massachusetts’ regulatory framework, bolstering its claim that it operates within the bounds of the law.

Detailed Revenue Breakdown Highlights Sports Contracts

Massachusetts authorities have underscored Kalshi’s significant focus on sports betting, as detailed in the court filing. Between February and May of this year, 70% of Kalshi’s transaction volume originated from sports-related contracts. This figure surged to 75% with the introduction of a single-game market tied to the NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament (commonly referred to as "March Madness"). Furthermore, during this same timeframe, Kalshi reportedly garnered higher revenue than prominent licensed competitors like DraftKings and FanDuel.

Kalshi’s Response and Market Defense

In response to the lawsuit, Kalshi emphasized its commitment to regulatory compliance and the scale of its operations. The company cited its substantial market activity, stating, “To date, we’ve facilitated $439 million in bets on NFL-related contracts alone. Kalshi provides users with a fair, transparent, and federally regulated nationwide market.” This statement underscores Kalshi’s efforts to position itself as a legitimate and transparent market for sports prediction trading.

A Pattern of Legal Challenges for Kalshi

This case is not an isolated incident for Kalshi, as the platform is also entangled in ongoing legal disputes in other jurisdictions, including New Jersey. Beyond defending against state regulatory challenges, Kalshi is actively advocating for the nationwide legalization and acceptance of sports prediction markets. The platform’s end goal is to solidify its status as a fully legal, federally regulated marketplace for predictive trading across the country.

Broader Implications for the Prediction Market Industry

The Massachusetts lawsuit underscores the growing legal and regulatory scrutiny facing prediction market platforms that blur the lines between financial instruments and sports gambling. With the rapid evolution of online betting platforms and predictive trading tools, state and federal authorities are increasingly challenged to define clear regulatory boundaries. Kalshi’s legal battles could set significant precedents for the future integration of prediction markets into the broader gambling and financial ecosystems.

For regular updates on this and other breaking news stories, follow Block Media on Telegram.

---

Related News

• CFTC Ends Legal Dispute with Kalshi, Approves U.S. Election Betting

Stay informed by following Block Media on Google News.