![[Weekly DeFi] Perpetual DEX Hits $1 Trillion Monthly Volume—DeFi Comeback or Market Bubble?](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.blockmedia.co.kr%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2025%2F10%2F20251025-094728.png%3Fformat%3Dwebp%26width%3D600&w=1200&q=70)
Image source: Block Media
The Structural Evolution Driving Quantitative Growth in On-Chain Derivatives
The decentralized finance (DeFi) sector is undergoing a transformative era, marking a historic shift in its trajectory. For the first time ever, monthly trading volumes on decentralized perpetual exchanges (Perpetual DEXs) have surpassed the $1 trillion threshold, challenging the dominance of centralized exchanges (CEXs) in leveraged trading activity. This milestone raises the question: is DeFi reclaiming its role as the vanguard of modern financial markets?
Beneath the surface, however, this resurgence reflects a more nuanced evolution than a mere return to prominence. While trading volumes are soaring, the market still grapples with limitations in economic depth and meaningful revenue generation. This article explores the dual narratives shaping on-chain derivatives: the exuberance of quantitative growth and the cautious emergence of sustainable maturity.
The Rise of the 'On-Chain Leveraged Era'
According to data from blockchain analytics platform DeFiLlama, the cumulative notional trading volume across global perpetual DEXs reached $1.01 trillion over a 30-day period ending October 25. This represents nearly a threefold increase compared to volume levels just six months prior. The milestone illustrates the growing significance of decentralized trading in the broader financial ecosystem.
Leading the pack, Hyperliquid achieved a remarkable $314.7 billion in trading volume, securing a dominant 31% market share. Lighter followed with $258.8 billion, while Aster generated $178.2 billion in volume. Collectively, these top three protocols accounted for more than 75% of total market activity, highlighting a concentrated competitive environment.
Importantly, the $1 trillion notional trading volume encompasses leverage embedded in derivative contracts, serving as a key indicator of speculative activity or market “heat.” This statistic, however, does not directly translate into liquidity or revenue generation—core components of sustainable market growth. The numbers underscore an upward trend, but deeper analysis is essential to understand the economic significance behind the trading frenzy.
Dissecting 'Quantitative Expansion' Through Token Terminal Data
Token Terminal, a platform aggregating financial insights across DeFi projects, reveals a critical gap between notional and realized trading volumes. While DeFiLlama reported over $1 trillion in trading activity, Token Terminal calculated the realized trading volume for the same 30-day period to be approximately $100-150 billion—representing just 10-15% of the notional figure. Realized volumes measure activity directly tied to fees and actual contract settlements, providing a clearer picture of revenue-driven outcomes.
Interestingly, the ranking of platforms shifts significantly when assessed by realized trading volumes. Aster, lagging behind Hyperliquid in notional volume, emerges as the leader with $39.9 billion in realized trading activity over 30 days, capturing an impressive 44.5% market share. Hyperliquid follows at $19.8 billion (22%), while Avantis claims third place with $13.8 billion (15%).
This divergence reflects qualitative differences in user engagement. While Hyperliquid dominates in speculative, high-leverage trades, Aster captures higher proportions of fee-based revenue through settlement-focused activity. Essentially, Hyperliquid excels in quantity, whereas Aster leads in quality. The discrepancy between the statistics underscores the different growth dynamics at play across the top platforms.
The Structural Gap: Trading Frenzy vs. Economic Substance
The disparity between notional and realized volumes highlights an inherent structural characteristic of the on-chain derivatives market: it remains largely transaction-driven. Much of the booming activity is concentrated in short-term speculative trades, frequent position changes, and arbitrage opportunities, rather than sustained liquidity or capital efficiency.
For instance, Hyperliquid’s open interest (OI) stands at approximately $7.5 billion, dwarfed by the tens of billions in OI for Bitcoin (BTC) futures on leading CEXs like Binance and Bybit. While on-chain trading continues to expand its breadth, its depth lags behind, with liquidity dominated by capital trends rather than long-term engagement.
Such limitations illustrate the fundamental challenges facing Perpetual DEXs. Although these platforms boast impressive activity levels, their current structure leans heavily on transactional metrics, leaving room for significant growth in economic fundamentals.
Trade-Centric DeFi: Redefining the Ecosystem
Despite its challenges, the $1 trillion milestone signals profound implications for DeFi. While the liquidity mining era of 2020 popularized a “deposit-focused DeFi” model, this new wave represents a shift toward a “trade-centric DeFi” ecosystem. Key innovations in execution infrastructure and user experience are driving this shift.
For example, several perpetual DEX platforms—such as Hyperliquid and Lighter—now operate on proprietary Layer 2 networks, boasting sub-second trading speeds that match the performance of major centralized exchanges. User interfaces rival the sophistication of CEXs, helping these platforms achieve daily trading volumes of $8-10 billion, comparable to certain Binance or OKX futures pairs.
This evolution signals that DeFi has moved beyond speculative experiments into a refined economic system. Enhanced technological capabilities and better trading execution have solidified perpetual DEXs as viable alternatives to CEXs for many traders.
A New Era of Decentralized Finance
What does the future hold for on-chain derivatives? According to market analysts, the rise of perpetual DEX platforms represents more than competition with centralized exchanges—it reflects the emergence of a trust-centric decentralized trading infrastructure.
The exponential growth of trading activity coupled with the technological advancements of leading protocols points toward a potential second golden age for DeFi. Unlike prior cycles marked predominantly by speculative frenzies, this next era could be characterized by enduring structural refinement and economic utility.
Ultimately, the $1 trillion milestone is more than a symptom of speculative enthusiasm; it is a testament to how far decentralized finance has progressed. As trade-centric DeFi gains momentum, the sector stands poised to redefine global financial systems, ushering in a future that balances robust activity with sustainable growth.










