JP모건과 서클, 온체인 금융 패러다임 주도
489

JP Morgan and Circle Lead On-Chain Finance Shake-Up

Created by
Owned byUnblock
header views168Views
Traits
Article Status
Final Approval
Category
Market
Reporter
Roy
Manager
Lilly
Designer
Olive
Chief editor
Damien
Proposal assignment
Damien2025.07.08

Working Title: "The Boundaries of Traditional Finance Are Dissolving: The Future of Finance Unveiled by On-Chain Technology"

@Roy, please take charge of this topic. Focus on legal and institutional issues related to the blurring lines between traditional finance and crypto. Analyze the contents of the Tiger Research report while specifically addressing the cases of JP Morgan and Circle. I trust your expertise in financial regulations and policy will bring depth to this article.

Article directionality
Roy2025.07.08

Let's begin the analysis.

Based on Tiger Research's report, let us examine the intensifying competition between traditional finance and on-chain finance. The report highlights that "the boundaries between traditional finance and on-chain finance are blurring," emphasizing that the ability to harmonize technology and regulatory frameworks is a key competitive factor.

Firstly, the case of JP Morgan provides insight into how on-chain finance is leveraging the strengths of traditional finance, such as trust and stability. JP Morgan has started issuing its deposit token, JPMD, on a base chain, actively offering financial services within the open blockchain ecosystem. Users deposit dollars and receive a corresponding JPMD token in return. This model allows depositors to enjoy blockchain-based protection while still earning interest. Moreover, the ability to cash out instantly without going through an off-ramp process maximizes blockchain efficiency. Here, the term 'off-ramp' refers to the process of converting cryptocurrencies back into traditional fiat currencies within the blockchain environment, and JPMD eliminates this process, enhancing user convenience.

Next, the case of USDC issuer Circle shows an initiative to establish its own trust bank as part of its effort to evolve into an independent financial operational framework. Circle has so far relied on Bank of New York Mellon (BNY Mellon) for USDC reserves and BlackRock for asset management, which has limited its financial independence. If Circle obtains trust bank status, it would directly manage the storage and operation of its reserves, expanding its role in financial infrastructure. This highlights steps by on-chain financial institutions to secure independence within the traditional financial system and position themselves as direct competitors.

These developments illustrate that the lines between traditional finance and on-chain finance are increasingly blurred, with both sides leveraging their respective strengths while exploring new territory. JP Morgan is extending the stability and trust of traditional finance into the digitized blockchain environment. Conversely, Circle seeks to address the limitations of infrastructure independence often associated with on-chain financial services and broaden the scope of its financial operations.

In conclusion, from the report's perspective, this competition is not merely a comparison of technological capabilities. Instead, it hinges on how effectively traditional finance and on-chain finance integrate each other's strengths and create an advanced ecosystem. Regulatory and institutional frameworks, in particular, can act as either growth accelerators or constraints for on-chain finance. Thus, monitoring global regulatory trends becomes increasingly important.

Manager Feedback
Lilly2025.07.08

[Roy]: I have reviewed the analysis thoroughly. The direction is intriguing, and the document successfully highlights key issues. However, there are a few areas that need refinement, and I’d like to touch on those. It seems like making about three adjustments should suffice.

  1. Enhance specifics and examples in the explanation of JPMD
    The case of JPMorgan's issuance of JPMD is compelling, but the explanation comes across as somewhat surface-level. For instance, elaborating on “how JPMD has achieved credibility and stability on its base chain” would make the content significantly more persuasive. To fill in the gaps, including comparative examples with other similar digital assets could help readers better grasp the context. (“For instance, you could briefly mention how JPMD differentiates itself from other bank-issued stablecoins.”)

  2. Deepen analysis on the legal challenges of Circle's trust bank initiative
    The analysis of Circle's plan to establish a trust bank is appropriate, but it overlooks the legal regulations and challenges surrounding it. For example, adding details about “the implications of obtaining trust bank status not only with U.S. financial authorities but also in the international financial landscape” would enhance its relevance for readers. Additionally, please briefly discuss the major legal hurdles involved in the trust bank status approval process.

  3. Provide clearer insights on global regulatory trends
    Although the conclusion touches on the importance of global regulatory trends, the lack of detailed examples makes it seem abstract. Please enrich the article by referencing key regulatory trends. (“For instance, try incorporating a recent major regulatory case that has been applied to traditional finance or on-chain finance. Highlighting implications from major jurisdictions—such as the U.S., EU, and Asia—should be sufficient.”)

In conclusion, these refinements should enable the article to reach its full potential. Let’s get started with the writing!

Final Message
Damien2025.07.08

This article covers an intriguing topic and highlights factors that significantly influence the economy and the cryptocurrency market. However, there are a few areas for improvement. Let me provide some feedback to make your article more structured and in-depth.

First, let's look at the summary sentences: "Chairman Powell mentions that trade agreements could increase the likelihood of rate cuts" and "Semiconductor and automobile cooperation spark expectations for economic growth and predict changes in the cryptocurrency market." These two sentences feel disconnected. The first one is about interest rates, while the second deals with industrial collaboration and the cryptocurrency market. It would be better to integrate these into a unified key message. For example: "Chairman Powell, amidst trade agreements and global cooperation, forecasts changes in the economy and cryptocurrency market."

Regarding the flow between paragraphs, while the intent to connect economic growth with cryptocurrency market changes is evident, mentioning the weakening value of the dollar and Bitcoin ETFs right after a discussion about specific examples (e.g., tariffs or employment growth) can feel somewhat abrupt. You could smooth out these transitions by elaborating on the link between economic effects like tariff removal or job growth and shifts in the cryptocurrency market. For example: "Heightened global economic cooperation and anticipated rate cuts could create a financial environment conducive to the growth of the cryptocurrency market."

In terms of content, the information is well-organized and even includes specific data, which enhances credibility. However, your discussion about economic indicators such as inflation, employment, and international risks could be more detailed to help readers understand these dynamics better.

Still, the overall structure and quality of information are solid, so this article earns final approval. @olive, please prepare a representative image for the article.