ZKsync Becomes First ZK Rollup to Achieve Full EVM Equivalence
Sure, here is the translation of your request into English:
Title: "ZKsync Achieves EVM Equivalence: Opening a New Chapter for the Ethereum Ecosystem"
@Techa, since you are interested in Ethereum and blockchain technology, please write an article about ZKsync achieving EVM equivalence. This is an important development and needs to be addressed promptly.
Let's start the analysis.
Today an important announcement was made via Twitter by @zksync. They announced that ZKsync has become fully EVM (Ethereum Virtual Machine) Equivalent. This is a significant milestone that could have a noteworthy impact on the blockchain and Ethereum community.
Being EVM Equivalent means that the ZKsync platform now operates in the same way as the EVM. Previously, test suites and deployment scripts had to be modified, but now existing EVM tools such as solc, Foundry, and Hardhat can be used directly. This makes it easier for developers to develop and deploy blockchain applications.
Furthermore, it has been reported that the "ZKsync Improvement Proposal 9 (ZIP-9)" has approved the EVM Interpreter in the Token Assembly. This indicates that this upgrade is not just a technical change, but a decision made through governance procedures. Currently, this upgrade has been applied in protocol version 27, known as Era, and is expected to be expanded to all other ZK chains within the Elastic Network soon.
ZKsync described this EVM Equivalence as the first step and announced that they will continue to progress for the future of Ethereum and the EVM. This provides important implications for the future direction of blockchain technology, representing significant progress in terms of technical integration and scalability.
In conclusion, this announcement by ZKsync is anticipated to bring significant changes for Ethereum developers and the blockchain community. The new EVM Equivalent status of ZKsync will help developers create blockchain applications more easily. This upgrade is meaningful not only on a technical level but also in terms of governance and community participation.
@Techa, you wrote the analysis well. Here are a few feedback points.
Firstly, you clearly explained that ZKsync has become EVM Equivalent, highlighting that developers can easily develop blockchain applications using existing tools. This emphasis is well done.
However, more supplementary explanation is needed regarding ZKsync Improvement Proposal 9 (ZIP-9). It's good that you mentioned that ZIP-9 was approved through a governance process, not just a technical change. However, providing more detailed explanations about the governance structure and decision-making process would help readers understand better. For example, you could briefly mention how the ZIP-9 proposal was submitted and reviewed.
Additionally, the section on protocol version 27 and Elastic Network felt a bit ambiguous. It needs a clearer explanation of what specific functions the Era protocol 27 offers and what role the Elastic Network plays. For instance, you could explain the differences between protocol 27 and earlier versions, and how the Elastic Network affects ZKsync's scalability and performance.
In the conclusion, you well summarized ZKsync's future plans and its impact on the blockchain community. Still, it would be better if you could add real-world examples. For instance, providing examples of specific projects or applications developed using ZKsync technology would help the readers relate more.
Only about three points need to be revised. Please start drafting your article.
This article is well written. Could you please provide some feedback, if any?
