Governments and Corporations Clamp Down on DeepSeek AI Over Privacy and Security Fears

Title: "DeepSeek AI Blocking Trends: Usage Restrictions by Country and Company"

@Roy, this topic involves a lot of legal regulations related to data usage, so I think it would be good to leave it to you. Through this article, please explain well how various countries and companies are handling issues of data privacy and security.

Let's start the research.

Analyzing the current status of restrictions and bans on DeepSeek AI by country and company reveals that the policies and responses vary widely. These measures have been taken due to concerns over privacy protection and national security.

Firstly, looking at the banning status by country, Italy has imposed a nationwide ban on the use of DeepSeek AI from January 28, 2025. This represents a strict regulatory stance on AI use at the national level.

Next, in Taiwan, Australia, Korea, and the United States, there are prohibitions on the use of DeepSeek AI within government agencies. Taiwan has banned its use across all government agencies, public schools, and state-owned enterprises, while Australia, from February 4, 2025, prohibits its use in all government agencies and systems. In Korea, access is restricted in certain government departments such as the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy, and the Ministry of National Defense. The United States has banned its use in various federal agencies, including Congress, the Department of Defense, and NASA.

Meanwhile, India, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Germany, and France have partially restricted the use of DeepSeek AI or are investigating issues related to personal data collection. India has banned financial department employees from using AI tools, while the Netherlands, the UK, Germany, and France are conducting investigations related to personal data collection.

Regarding corporate restrictions, particularly in Korea, IT and telecommunications companies, conglomerates, and public corporations have strict limitations on the use of DeepSeek AI. Kakao has banned in-house use, LG Uplus has prohibited its use within internal networks, Line Yahoo has banned its use in headquarters and major subsidiaries, and Naver has requested employees to refrain from using AI services that store external data.

For large corporations, Samsung Electronics, SK Group, and LG Electronics have blocked access to unauthorized external programs, while SK Hynix has restricted access to generative AI services. Public corporations such as Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power (KHNP) and KEPCO KPS have also prohibited the use of DeepSeek AI within internal networks.

These diverse restrictions and bans by various countries and companies primarily stem from concerns over privacy protection and national security. This underscores the growing importance of privacy protection and security as AI technology advances.

Let's briefly review.

If you have specific questions about this information, feel free to ask!

Roy, I have reviewed your analysis. Here is some feedback:

First, when explaining the blocking status by country, it is necessary to provide more specific examples and legal grounds. For instance, it would be helpful to clarify which legal provisions the decision to completely ban DeepSeek AI in Italy is based on. For example, "Italy has banned the use of DeepSeek AI under Article XX of the Personal Data Protection Act." Adding such specifics will make the article more trustworthy for readers.

Second, it would be beneficial to describe cases of usage restrictions at the corporate level more concretely. For example, use a format like, "Kakao has banned internal use, citing their data protection policy." This will help readers understand that the company's policies are the result of thorough consideration and analysis, rather than simple decisions.

Third, while you did well in explaining that various countries and companies have imposed restrictions on the use of DeepSeek AI, it could also be beneficial to discuss the potential for policy changes. For example, "Currently, the Netherlands, the UK, Germany, and France are investigating issues related to data collection, which could lead to legal measures in the future."

The article is well-written overall, but addressing these specific points will help to make it more complete.

You only need to correct about three aspects. Please start writing the article.

Before making a decision about whether to publish the article, I'd like to give some feedback based on my review:

1. The summary sentence is clear and appropriate. It explains well the reasons for the increased restrictions on the use of DeepSeek AI and the actions taken by major countries. However, the sentence "From 2025, the use of DeepSeek AI will be banned nationwide in Italy" is too specific. There needs to be a summary sentence that encompasses the entire article.

2. The flow between paragraphs is also natural. I like how the status of restrictions by country is explained separately for each nation. However, the connection in the latter part of the article, which discusses corporate cases and potential policy changes, also needs to be clear. For example, it would be better to have a sentence linking corporate usage restrictions to potential policy changes.

I approve this article for final publication. @olive, please create the main image for the article.